Dark Tumblr Themes
Next Page

To Be Determined

I don't really have a specific theme for what I post, this is just my personal blog where I keep all the things I really find interesting. I do hope my followers have a similar interest in what I post and hopefully in the future I'll make more specifically themed blogs!

zealouscorgi:

i forgot what i was doing

saw a gif of this but i can’t remember where i saw it fff if anyone knows, please tell me!
EDIT: FOUND IT


revengeofnemo:

If a 16 year old would want to adopt a child no one would give it to her because she isn’t 21 yet or not an adult or maybe too irresponsible.

So if a 16 year old is so irresponsible and not an adult yet so she wouldn’t even be allowed to adopt a child, then why would the government force her to get that child even though she might not want it?

Let’s talk about how logical the bill against abortion is now


theroguefeminist:

spaceberryfeminist:

morismako:

magdalenarivera:

I’d like to report a crime…

 

this man has a face like sunshine and a torso like hellfire

this is poetry


misswallflower:

Narcissa Niblack Thorne , known as Mrs James Ward Thorne,  (May 2, 1882 – June 25, 1966) was an American artist who created extremely detailed miniature rooms. Her works depict historical interiors from Europe, Asia and North America from the late 13th to the early 20th century. 

x


"Mom, I can’t save during a battle!"


CAPTAIN AMERICA FUCK YEAH

whyartthouinmyroomofslumbering:

STEVE PLS

TASHA YOU FUCKING BADASS

SAM WAS FUCKING AWESOME

I FUCKING KNEW IT. FUCKING CALLED IT FROM THE BEGINNING

FURY BEING ALL FURY

HILL WAS VERY EXCELLENT

FUCKING S.H.I.E.L.D. I SHOULD HAVE KNOWN. SHOULD HAVE SEEN IT COMING

WHERE THE FUCK WAS CLINT???? LIKE HE IS A PART OF SHIELD AND THERE WAS NO FUCKING MENTION OF WHAT HAPPENED!!!

BUCKY, BBY NO

BUCKY WHY?

BUCKY PLS.

STEVE STOP JUMPING OUT OF PLANES YOU CANNOT FLY.

FLASHBACKS


basedpidgeot:

versacegravy:

My nigga why is EVERYTHING too small for you tho? Your shoes can’t cover your ankles, your pants can’t cover your calves, and your shirt is desperately waiting for you to exhale. Nigga look like the hulk mid-transformation. Like he was gettin angry but then cooled off

he could genuinely kill us all with one arm we need to stop reblogging this

basedpidgeot:

versacegravy:

My nigga why is EVERYTHING too small for you tho? Your shoes can’t cover your ankles, your pants can’t cover your calves, and your shirt is desperately waiting for you to exhale. Nigga look like the hulk mid-transformation. Like he was gettin angry but then cooled off

he could genuinely kill us all with one arm we need to stop reblogging this


what is this? im in love


stovestalker:

noshamejustlove:

zorobro:

shota-purinsu:

zorobro:

linzthenerd:

theguilteaparty:

crippledcuriosity:

itsfondue:

Isn’t it nice how people twist their religious scripture to suit their weds but when it’s used against them it’s suddenly not okay

I talked to a monk about this quote once (we have mutual friends, and he came to a New Year’s Eve party at my shared art studio). He said this isn’t even talking about homosexuality. That the bible never actually says homosexuality is wrong. What that passage means is this:

Women were treated as subservient and it that you shouldn’t treat other men as subservient, like they are beneath you. It is not talking about homosexuality. If it was, it would say it outright since the bible lists other things outright.

I take the word of a monk who have studied the bible extensively more than a self proclaimed Christian.

The above text, I would like to point out is from the point of view of this translation of the original Hebrew. I spoke with my cousin’s rabbi on the matter and his response was different, saying that it was a mistranslation. See, the true translation says that a man shall not lie with another in the bed of a woman, which is to say, the Hebrews had a shit ton of rules about when a man was or was not allowed in a woman’s bed and private quarters (including, if she didn’t want you there, you weren’t allowed there. Hebrew women were also allowed to divorce their husbands and the image of the ‘oppressive Hebrew people’ is an image that was propogated by Christianity which, historically speaking, doesn’t treat the Jewish people too well and liked to paint them as being rather barbaric and backwards and cultish with their traditions, which, another piece of fun info, their traditions were one of the main reasons why the Jewish people were less likely, in medieval times, to die of the plague. Because washing your hands and avoiding the dead and vermin and the like was a lot of help. Of course the Christians persecuted them for not dying but that’s another matter. I’m sidetracked). So the verse is literally saying ‘Don’t fuck in some lady’s bed because that’s just goddamn rude’

Also, whenever a Christian brings the book of Leviticus up, you should feel free to point out that these are rules that were given to make the Hebrew people prepared for when the son of God came to earth. In Christianity, it’s believed the son of God was Jesus. So by following the rules set in Leviticus or pushing them as things we should follow, they’re saying that Jesus was not the son of God, and that Jesus did not, in fact, die for our sins. Jewish people believe, in their faith, that the son of God hasn’t yet been born, so many choose to follow these rules.

Most people of course roll their eyes when I explain the translation of the verse (full breakdown found here) but it’s always fun to point out the nature of the rules in Leviticus and the implications of following them. 

I’m a theology student and I am on the verge of crying because of how accurate this commentary is. Historical context is simultaneously the most interesting and most important part of interpreting any texts. 

Most religious people seem to base their beliefs on things that are severely mistranslated. I wish they would do their research before using the bible for hate.

I studied theology extensively and was going to become a theologist until I switched majors. The above commentary is 100% accurate and what I try to stress in a lot if conversations with Bible Thumpers.

Jesus also affirms the homosexual relationship between the Roman Centurion and his “slave”. The particular Greek word used to refer to this special slave was “pais”. Greek language studies and contexts show that a “pais” was a male love slave. Regular slaves were called “dolos”. The Centurion makes this distinction clearly when he asks Jesus to heal his slave (pais), and then to prove his status he tells Jesus that his slaves (dolos) go when he tells them to. But this slave (pais) was special. He was the Centurion’s lover.

Hearing this, Jesus was so amazed he says he had not found ANYONE ELSE who had such great faith. He then blesses the Centurion and heals his male lover.

Matthew 8:5-13

THIS IS WHAT THE BIBLE REALLY TEACHES ABOUT SAME SEX COUPLES.

In short, the English adaptation is a mistranslated farce.

^^^^this

reblogging for the comments ^^^^^^

EXCUSE ME WHILE I REBLOG THIS FIFTY MILLION TIMES



    #YOU KNOW WHAT THOUGH #THIS IS THE FIRST TIME SOMEONE’S TOUCHED HIM WITH GENUINE AFFECTION AND NO VIOLENCE IN FORTY FUCKING YEARS #NO WONDER HE FUCKING CLINGS TO BOBBY LIKE THAT #NO WONDER HE MAKES THAT FACE #I JUST CAN’T


lokibubbles:


mspaintadventuring:

tranimation:

Patients of surgeon Harold Gillies during WWI and WWII

Okay, these photographs pissed me off a bit, because they don’t show off how much of a genius Dr. Harold Gillies, the father of modern plastic surgery, was.  Rhinoplasty, skin grafts, and facial reconstructions have been practised for centuries.  However, it was this New Zealander surgeon who standardized these techniques and established the discipline of “plastic surgery.”

The introduction of more destructive weapons of WWI and WWII resulted in devastating injuries. In addition, in trench warfare, the head was more exposed than the rest of the body, and soldiers’ faces were often shattered or burnt beyond recognition. Despite the best efforts of surgeons, many soldiers were left hideously disfigured. Traditionally, the edges of facial wounds were simply stitched together, but when scar tissue contracted faces were left twisted and disfigured, so a new type of surgery was needed.

Gillies rebuilt faces using tissue from elsewhere in the body. Antibiotics had not yet been invented, meaning it was very hard to graft tissue from one part of the body to another because infection often developed, so Gillies invented the tubed pedicle,” where he used a flap of skin from the chest or forehead and “swung” it into place over the face. The flap remained attached but was stitched into a tube. This kept the original blood supply intact and dramatically reduced the infection rate.  After many surgical construction, grafting, and healing, which could take months to years, the tentacle-like tubing would be removed, and (volia!) a new face!

image

image

image

image

He was also the first to do sex reassignment surgery from female to male in 1946, then male to female using a flap technique in 1951, which became the standard for 40 years.

image

tl;dr, these were his patients BEFORE the surgery. He didn’t DISFIGURE these people he HELPED them.


mspaintadventuring:

tranimation:

Patients of surgeon Harold Gillies during WWI and WWII

Okay, these photographs pissed me off a bit, because they don’t show off how much of a genius Dr. Harold Gillies, the father of modern plastic surgery, was.  Rhinoplasty, skin grafts, and facial reconstructions have been practised for centuries.  However, it was this New Zealander surgeon who standardized these techniques and established the discipline of “plastic surgery.”

The introduction of more destructive weapons of WWI and WWII resulted in devastating injuries. In addition, in trench warfare, the head was more exposed than the rest of the body, and soldiers’ faces were often shattered or burnt beyond recognition. Despite the best efforts of surgeons, many soldiers were left hideously disfigured. Traditionally, the edges of facial wounds were simply stitched together, but when scar tissue contracted faces were left twisted and disfigured, so a new type of surgery was needed.

Gillies rebuilt faces using tissue from elsewhere in the body. Antibiotics had not yet been invented, meaning it was very hard to graft tissue from one part of the body to another because infection often developed, so Gillies invented the tubed pedicle,” where he used a flap of skin from the chest or forehead and “swung” it into place over the face. The flap remained attached but was stitched into a tube. This kept the original blood supply intact and dramatically reduced the infection rate.  After many surgical construction, grafting, and healing, which could take months to years, the tentacle-like tubing would be removed, and (volia!) a new face!

image

image

image

image

He was also the first to do sex reassignment surgery from female to male in 1946, then male to female using a flap technique in 1951, which became the standard for 40 years.

image

tl;dr, these were his patients BEFORE the surgery. He didn’t DISFIGURE these people he HELPED them.


Apr 22nd at 2AM / via: dicks-and-kittens / op: supahjewelz / 212,189 notes
impactprincess:

fintonmusic:

supahjewelz:

I thought we were having a moment…you ruined it

I’m crying

Omgomg

impactprincess:

fintonmusic:

supahjewelz:

I thought we were having a moment…you ruined it

I’m crying

Omgomg


defnotyouraveragewoman:

mandeecarek:

webofgoodnews:

Animals getting help from people.

😢😢😢😢😢😢

OMG I’m literally bawling my eyes out.

I don’t know what made it worse. The piggie, the squirrel.

no, the mama cat. ughhhhg.

humans can be horrible creatures but we can be really amazing wonderful creatures as well, you just have to believe the good will outweigh the bad.